MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210814747 · doi:10.21608/ejhc.2015.216954

Effect of the Sanyinjiao Point (SP6) Acupressure on Reducing Labor Pain at Ismailia Governmental Hospitals

2015· article· en· W4210814747 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asmaa Morgan Farahat Khatap, Azza Ali Abd El-Hamid, Inas Mohamed Abd Allah, Soheir M. El-Kosery

Bibliographic record

VenueEgyptian Journal of Health Care · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcupressureMedicinePoint (geometry)Labor painPhysical therapyOperations managementAlternative medicineEngineeringMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: labor pain is often described as the worst pain in a woman's life, acupressure is one of non-pharmacologic methods can help women copes with the pain of labor. Aim of the study: was to assess the effect of sanyinjiao point (SP6) acupressure on reducing labor pain intensity. Design: a quasi-experimental design was adopted. Setting: data collected from two settings; delivery wards of the Suez Canal University Hospital and General Hospital in Ismailia City. Sample: convenience sample of 60 nulliparous women fulfilled the selection criteria were divided into interventional and control group. Tools of data collection: four tools; Structured Interview, Short form McGill pain questionnaire, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and Investigation record were used. Results: there was statistical significance reduction of labor pain for study group compared to control group by using Wong Baker faces pain scales immediately, after 30 and 60 minutes from intervention. The mean difference of plasma cortisol level was 1.6±73.7 for interventional group versus 10.37±136.0 for control group with statistical significance differences (p=0.000) immediately after intervention. Conclusions: these findings showed that, SP6 acupressure was effective to decrease labor pain for nulliparous women during active phase of labor. Recommendation: involve application of SP6 acupressure procedure at labor ward as a part of nursing care

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEgyptian Journal of Health CareSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207