NanoLuc reporters identify COL4A5 nonsense mutations susceptible to drug-induced stop codon readthrough
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alport syndrome, a disease of kidney, ear, and eye, is caused by pathogenic variants in the COL4A3, COL4A4, or COL4A5 genes encoding collagen α3α4α5(IV) of basement membranes. Collagen IV chains that are truncated due to nonsense variants/premature termination codons (PTCs) cannot assemble into heterotrimers or incorporate into basement membranes. To investigate the feasibility of PTC readthrough therapy for Alport syndrome, we utilized two NanoLuc reporters in transfected cells: full-length for monitoring translation, and a split version for assessing readthrough product function. Full-length assays of 49 COL4A5 nonsense variants identified eleven as susceptible to PTC readthrough using various readthrough drugs. In split-NanoLuc assays, the predicted missense α5(IV) readthrough products of five nonsense mutations could heterotrimerize with α3(IV) and α4(IV). Readthrough was also observed in kidney cells from an engineered Col4a5 PTC mouse model. These results suggest that readthrough therapy is a feasible approach for a fraction of patients with Alport syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".