Low cycle fatigue behavior of Inconel 706 at 650 °C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior of 2- and 3-step-aged Inconel 706 (IN706) specimens that were prepared from the center and the periphery of forged disc was examined at 650 °C and an R ratio of −1. The resistance to LCF of IN706 alloy was greater in approximately half order at 650 °C than that of IN718 alloy for the same aging condition. Elevated temperature Coffin–Manson relationship between 2- and 3-step-aged IN706 specimens was similar with each other, despite a considerable difference in microstructure. The fractographic analysis suggested that cluster of carbides provided the sites for crack initiation for both 2- and 3-step-aged specimens. The mode of fatigue crack growth for each specimen was intergranular and transgranular, but with different magnitude for each mode. Depending on the location of specimen preparation form the forged block of IN706 alloy, no notable difference in LCF resistance was found. The role of grain boundaries, clusters of carbides and bands of acicular η platelets on the initiation and propagation mechanism of IN706 alloy was discussed based on detailed fractographic and micrographic analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".