Predictions of arrhythmic, heart failure and mortality outcomes in pericarditis using automatic electrocardiogram analysis: a retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Pericarditis is a relatively rare disease with a global burden. Despite its strong association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, identification of patients at risk of future heart failure or arrhythmic events is difficult. In the following study, automated electrocardiogram (ECG) variables were used to predict new onset ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF) in an Asian cohort of pericarditis patients. Purpose Assessing the use of automated ECG parameters to predict prognosis in pericarditis patients. Methods Consecutive patients admitted to a single tertiary center in China, for a diagnosis of pericarditis between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2019, were included. Patients with existing AF or HF were excluded. The follow-up period was until the 31st December 2020, or death. Cox regression was applied to identify significant predictors of the incident VT/VF, AF or HFrEF. Results A total of 874 patients were included. The cohort was 57% male and had a median age of 59 (IQR: 50-70) years old. During follow-up, 57 patients (6.5%), 156 (17.8%) and 168 (19.2%) suffered from VT/VF, AF and HF, respectively. Cox regression identified baseline VT/VF, terminal angle of the QRS vector in the transverse plane, mean QRS duration and mean QTc intervals as significant predictors of incident VT/VF events, with only the foremost maintaining significance in multivariate analysis. In contrast, baseline age, prior diagnoses of hypertension, malignancy and atrial flutter, initial angle and magnitude of the QRS vector in the transverse plane, P-wave and QRS axis in the frontal plane, ST segment axis in the frontal and horizontal planes, mean PT interval, mean PR segment duration and QTc intervals were all univariate predictors of incident AF, albeit only baseline age and initial angle of the QRS vector in the transverse plane retained significance after multivariate adjustment. As it pertains to new-onset HFrEF, several clinical and electrocardiographic parameters demonstrated an association in univariate analysis, with history of hypertension, history of sudden cardiac death (SCD), initial QRS angle in transverse plane, initial 40ms QRS complex axis, ST-segment axis in the horizontal plane, T-wave frontal axis and atrial rate all showcasing significant relationships in multivariate analysis. Conclusions AF and HFrEF are relatively common complications, whilst VT/VF occurs less frequently in the context of pericarditis. Different clinical and ECG predictors of these outcomes were identified. Future studies are still needed to evaluate their use for risk stratification in the clinical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".