MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210905213 · doi:10.1109/tia.2022.3148969

Novel Single-Phase Cuk-Derived Bridgeless PFC Converter for On-Board EV Charger With Reduced Number of Components

2022· article· en· W4210905213 on OpenAlexaff
Sukanya Dutta, Sivanagaraju Gangavarapu, Akshay Kumar Rathore, Rajeev Kumar Singh, Santanu Mishra, Vinod Khadkikar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsĆuk converterPower factorRobustness (evolution)InductorBoost converterBuck–boost converterElectronic engineeringForward converterElectrical engineeringEngineeringBuck converterFlyback converterVoltageControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl (management)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a novel single-phase bridgeless Cuk-derived power factor corrected (PFC) converter with reduced component count for on-board EV charging application. The unique feature of this proposal is to design and operate the output inductor of the converter in discontinuous current mode for the complete power range to attain PFC naturally at ac mains, thereby not requiring the input voltage and input current sensing, which reduces the converter cost, and improves the power density as well as converter robustness to high-frequency noise. The converter control is very simple in operation and easy in implementation with only a single sensor-based voltage control loop. The semiconductor components voltage stress of the proposed power converter is lower when compared to the traditional Cuk converter. The simulation results from PSIM 11 and experimental results are given by testing a proof-of-concept hardware laboratory prototype to demonstrate the high performance of PFC operation of the proposed converter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207