MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210919997 · doi:10.52843/cassyni.vdvflb

The GRASP atomic structure code - current status, the CompAS collaboration and hopes for the future

2022· preprint· en· W4210919997 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jon Grumer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVetenskapsrådetWenner-Gren Stiftelserna
KeywordsPhysicsRadiative transferPauli exclusion principleAstrophysicsComputational physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quality and resolution of solar, stellar, and other types of astrophysical spectra have improved to the extent that the accuracy and availability of atomic data is frequently a limiting factor in the interpretation of observations in astronomy. With the new generation of ground-based spectrographs and space missions, such as the recent CRIRES+ upgrade on the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), new demands are put on complete and accurate atomic data in the relatively unexplored infrared (IR) spectral regime. In particular, data on heavy, complex atomic species such as the various ionization stages of the Lanthanide and Actinide group of elements are needed for the interpretation of more exotic astrophysical events involving neutron-capture elements such as the Kilonova (KN) ejecta following the neutron-star merger observed in 2017. Analyses of such events require not only data of spectroscopic accuracy, e.g. for element identifications, but also complete data for accurate opacities in the radiative-transfer modeling to track e.g. the brightness evolution. Laboratory measurements, e.g. using ion/traps, beam-foil, or laser techniques, have been performed for isolated transitions and atoms, but no systematic laboratory studies exist or are currently in progress. Instead, the bulk of these atomic data must be calculated. To solve these new challenges, multiconfigurational (Dirac-) Hartree-Fock methods, either non-relativistic with Breit-Pauli corrections or fully relativistic, could be considered a promising way forward. The main advantage of these approaches is their general applicability to excited and open-shell systems, including open f- and g-shells, across the whole periodic table, thus allowing for the production of extensive atomic data sets with transition energies and probabilities. Additional physical properties of interest can readily be determined from the obtained wavefunctions. The accuracy of such calculations depends on the complexity of the shell structure and on the underlying adopted model for describing electron correlation. By systematically increasing the basis in large-scale calculations, as well as exploring different models for electron correlation, it is often possible to provide an estimate of the accuracy. In this talk I will describe our current, [open-source](https://github.com/compas ), community effort within the Computational Atomic Physics ([CompAS](https://compas.github.io )) collaboration, to build upon the important and acclaimed work on state-of-the-art multiconfigurational codes by Profs. Charlotte F Fischer and Ian P Grant, with a particular focus on the relativistic variant: the general-purpose relativistic atomic structure package, [GRASP](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.10.032 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207