MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210952328 · doi:10.1002/ange.202011372

Reversible Silylium Transfer between P‐H and Si‐H Donors

2020· article· en· W4210952328 on OpenAlexafffund
Roman G. Belli, Dimitrios A. Pantazis, Robert McDonald, Lisa Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMax-Planck-Gesellschaft
KeywordsSilaneChemistrySilanesElectrophileAdductPhosphineLewis acids and basesHydrosilylationCatalysisMedicinal chemistryPolymer chemistryLigand (biochemistry)PhotochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Mo=PR2 π* orbital in a Mo phosphenium complex acts as acceptor in a new PIII‐based Lewis superacid. This Lewis acid (LA) participates in electrophilic Si‐H abstraction from E3SiH to give a Mo‐bound secondary phosphine ligand, Mo‐PR2H. The resulting Et3Si+ ion remains associated with the Mo complex, stabilized by η1‐P‐H donation, yet undergoes rapid exchange with an η1‐Si‐H adduct of free silane in solution. The equilibrium between these two adducts presents an opportunity to assess the role of this new LA in catalytic reactions of silanes: is the LA acting as a catalyst or as an initiator? Preliminary results suggest that a cycle including the Mo‐bound phosphine‐silylium adduct dominates in the catalytic hydrosilylation of acetophenone, relative to a putative cycle involving the silane‐silylium adduct or “free” silylium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie→Same topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry→French-language works237,207→