Specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgY-scFv is a promising tool for recognition of the virus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread globally, a series of vaccines, antibodies and drugs have been developed to combat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). High specific antibodies are powerful tool for the development of immunoassay and providing passive immunotherapy against SARS-CoV-2 and expected with large scale production. SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein was expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography, as antigen used to immunize hens, the specific IgY antibodies were extracted form egg yolk by PEG-6000 precipitation, and the titer of anti-S1 IgY antibody reached 1:10,000. IgY single chain variable fragment antibody (IgY-scFv) was generated by using phage display technology and the IgY-scFv showed high binding sensitivity and capacity to S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2, and the minimum detectable antigen S1 protein concentration was 6 ng/µL. The docking study showed that the multiple epitopes on the IgY-scFv interacted with multiple residues on SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD to form hydrogen bonds. This preliminary study suggests that IgY and IgY-scFv are suitable candidates for the development of immunoassay and passive immunotherapy for COVID-19 to humans and animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it