MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211044992 · doi:10.1177/19418744211073389

Progressive Myelopathy With Acute Worsening After Steroids and Lumbar Puncture

2022· article· en· W4211044992 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Thebault, W.J. Kim, Jeremiah Hadwen, Gregory Walker, Brian Drake, Tadeu A. Fantaneanu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neurohospitalist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyelopathyTransverse myelitisLumbarLumbar punctureNeurosurgeryNeuroradiologySurgeryNeurologyRadiologyHyperintensityMagnetic resonance imagingSpinal cordCerebrospinal fluidInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of a 73-year-old woman with a 3-month history of non-traumatic thoracic myelopathy. Initial MRI showed a T6-conus T2 signal hyperintensity. Based on this presentation, and given a personal and family history of autoimmune disease, our patient was first managed as an inflammatory transverse myelitis. Subsequent worsening after lumbar puncture and steroids prompted re-evaluation, ultimately identifying the cause as a thoracic spinal dural AV fistula. Both investigation of possible transverse myelitis with lumbar puncture and empiric treatment with steroids may not only result in diagnostic delays but also precipitate venous infarction and irreversible harm. While the MRI often provides the initial diagnosis, clinical suspicion for this under-diagnosed cause of myelopathy should be raised in older patients with a more progressive thoracic myelopathy with worsening after lumbar puncture and/or steroids. Definitive and time-sensitive treatment by interventional neuroradiology or neurosurgery results in stabilization or improvement of disability in most cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe NeurohospitalistSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207