MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211152155 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.043517

BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole

2022· article· lv· W4211152155 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Oliver H. E. Philcox, Mikhail M. Ivanov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadYork UniversityNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterJinan UniversitySpace Telescope Science InstitutePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of VirginiaUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of ArizonaCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of UtahCarnegie Mellon UniversityMichigan State UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversity of FloridaUniversity of TokyoOhio State UniversityCentro de Biología Molecular Severo OchoaNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityHarvard UniversitySimons FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBossCosmologyPhysicsAstrophysicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a full $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ analysis of the BOSS DR12 dataset, including information from the power spectrum multipoles, the real-space power spectrum, the reconstructed power spectrum and the bispectrum monopole. This is the first analysis to feature a complete treatment of the galaxy bispectrum, including a consistent theoretical model and without large-scale cuts. Unlike previous works, the statistics are measured using window-free estimators: this greatly reduces computational costs by removing the need to window-convolve the theory model. Our pipeline is tested using a suite of high-resolution mocks and shown to be robust and precise, with systematic errors far below the statistical thresholds. Inclusion of the bispectrum yields consistent parameter constraints and shrinks the ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}$ posterior by 13% to reach $&lt;5%$ precision; less conservative analysis choices would reduce the error bars further. Our constraints are broadly consistent with Planck: in particular, we find ${H}_{0}={69.6}_{\ensuremath{-}1.3}^{+1.1}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}=0.69{2}_{\ensuremath{-}0.041}^{+0.035}$ and ${n}_{s}=0.87{0}_{\ensuremath{-}0.064}^{+0.067}$, including a BBN prior on the baryon density. When ${n}_{s}$ is set by Planck, we find ${H}_{0}=68.3{1}_{\ensuremath{-}0.86}^{+0.83}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}=0.72{2}_{\ensuremath{-}0.036}^{+0.032}$. Our ${S}_{8}$ posterior, $0.751\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.039$, is consistent with weak lensing studies, but lower than Planck. Constraints on the higher-order bias parameters are significantly strengthened from the inclusion of the bispectrum, and we find no evidence for deviation from the dark matter halo bias relations. These results represent the most complete full-shape analysis of BOSS DR12 to-date, and the corresponding spectra will enable a variety of beyond-$\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ analyses, probing phenomena such as the neutrino mass and primordial non-Gaussianity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations264
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207