MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4211176506 · doi:10.1017/9781108275439.007

Eastern Kentucky and Ohio

2018· book-chapter· en· W4211176506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. J. M. Blackett

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorHistoryDilemmaArchaeologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the former slave, Josiah Henson, recalled, he faced a tricky dilemma when in 1825 he arrived with a boatload of fellow slaves in Cincinnati. He had been directed by his Maryland master to take the slaves to a plantation in western Kentucky. When their boat docked in Cincinnati, the “colored people” suggested that the group “remain with them,” using, Henson recalled, “all the arguments now so familiar to induce slaves to quit their masters.” But Henson felt honor bound to complete the task he was assigned. Years later, when he did decide to escape from slavery in Daviess County, Kentucky, Henson headed to the black community in Cincinnati, which protected him and guided him to the shores of Lake Erie from which he sailed to Canada. Blacks in the city were not the only ones who tried to persuade Henson and the group of slaves to leave. Wherever they stopped along the northern banks of the Ohio River they were met with similar receptions. Situated as they were – almost directly opposite towns and villages on the other side of the river – Henson's possible ports of call became geographically significant in the evolving political dispute over fugitive slaves. They provided places of protection and rest for slaves on the run from the northern counties of Kentucky. Those fleeing Boone, Kenton, and Campbell counties through Covington usually headed first for Cincinnati, although in some instances slaves leaving Boone County opted to cross the river into Indiana at Lawrenceburg or Aurora. From Bracken, Mason, and Lewis counties they traveled through Maysville before heading for the safety of Ripley, Ohio. Ironton, along the river, east of Ripley, provided similar support for those from Greenup County, Kentucky, and Cabell County, Virginia. These river towns were also the departure points for those who went south to help slaves escape. Equally significant were the black rural settlements close to the river in southern Ohio, which, as one historian has argued, became meccas attracting fugitives from eastern Kentucky. Poke Patch, north of Ironton, and twenty miles from the river, was a vital link in the system of escape routes leading through Lawrence and Gallia counties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1370.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicRace, History, and American Society→French-language works237,207→