Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A single gene product has been identified as responsible for the two catalytic activities, xanthine dehydrogenase, XDH (EC 1.1.1.204), and xanthine oxidase, XO (EC 1.2.3.2). Synthesized as XDH (ultimate electron acceptor NAD+), the protein can be converted to XO (ultimate electron acceptor oxygen) either reversibly by oxidation of cysteine residues or irreversibly by proteolysis. Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is a ubiquitous enzyme; its physiological role is the oxidation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and further to uric acid, althoughin vitrothe enzyme's specificity is rather broad, accepting a large number of purines, pteridines, and aldehydes as substrates. XOR, in contrast to most other hydroxylases, incorporates water‐derived oxygen into its substrate. The electrons are transferred from xanthine to a Mopterin center and from there via two Fe2–S2clusters and FAD to NAD+or oxygen, respectively. The enzyme is the target of the antigout drug allopurinol; it is involved in hyperuricemia and xanthinuria and postulated to participate in postischemic reperfusion injury. Crystal structures have been determined for native and mutant XDHs and XOs from man, cow, rat, and Rhodobacter capsulatus . The conformational changes linked to the dehydrogenase/oxidase transition have been identified and interpreted. A structure‐based explanation for the catalytic mechanism is emerging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".