Planktic Foraminiferal Assemblages in Surface Sediments From the Subpolar North Atlantic Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) Ocean has complex hydrography, and moderates the global climate through the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). The surface water mass dynamics in SPNA and the upper limb of AMOC, govern the plankton distribution. Specifically, the habitat of modern planktic foraminifera is strongly affected by the SPNA hydrography. In the present study, 25 surface sediment samples from the Labrador Sea to the Iceland-Faroe-Shetland Channel (IFSC) were examined for planktic foraminifera distribution along a latitudinal transect at 59.50°N. The planktic foraminifera distribution followed the transition in water mass structure in the study area from the Sub-Arctic water in the west to the warm North Atlantic water in the east. Temperature and salinity are two dominant ecological factors controlling planktic foraminifera assemblages in the region. This hydrographic contrast was also reflected in the ratio of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma / Neogloboquadrina incompta along the transect. Based on the cluster analysis, the planktic foraminifera assemblages could be assigned to three groups. A cold/polar group in the Labrador Sea, a mixed (both cold and warm) group in the Irminger Sea and IFSC, and a warmer temperate group in the eastern part of the transect were represented by different planktic foraminifera assemblages. Additionally, a decrease in Globorotalia inflata in the eastern transect and an increase in Turborotalita quinqueloba in the Iceland basin and Irminger Sea was observed in our study when compared with the published dataset. From this, we suggest a shift in planktic assemblages in the SPNA. The present study on the distribution of modern planktic foraminifera can help paleoceanographic reconstructions in the SPNA ocean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".