Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wie viele französische Intellektuelle seiner Generation hat Lefebvre die Distanziertheit der traditionellen Philosophie von Politik und Alltagsleben verurteilt. Seine Schriften sind mit Erkenntnissen über alltägliche Existenz und revolutionäre politische Engagements durchzogen: anti-koloniale Agitation Mitte der 1920er, kommunistische Parteipolitik von 1928 bis 1958, die antifaschistische Résistance während des Zweiten Weltkriegs, die Neue Linke und der Mai 1968. In den frühen 1920ern war Lefebvre Mitglied einer kleinen Gruppe von linksgerichteten Studenten, welche die Zeitschrift Philosophies gründeten und die dominierende Bergson’sche Philosophie dieser Zeit anfochten. Angezogen von ihrer radikalen Kritik der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und des Rationalismus, und ihrem Verlangen, das Leben zu verändern, hat sich Lefebvre kurz darauf den Surrealisten angeschlossen. Während er ihre Kritik des Realen durch das Surreale und ihre Wiedergabe des Trivialen als unerträglich schätzte (Lefebvre, 1991, 29), kritisierte er ihre Geringschätzung des Realen. „[L]ife is not changed magically by a poetic act, as the surrealists believed“, erinnert uns Lefebvre Jahre später (1968, 90).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.084 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".