Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry Enables Robust Quantitation of Plasma Proteins Regardless of Whole Blood Processing Delays That May Occur in the Clinic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plasma is an important biofluid for clinical research and diagnostics. In the clinic, unpredictable delays-from minutes to hours-between blood collection and plasma generation are often unavoidable. These delays can potentially lead to protein degradation and modification and might considerably affect intact protein measurement methods such as sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays that bind proteins on two epitopes to increase specificity, thus requiring largely intact protein structures. Here, we investigated, using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS), how delays in plasma processing affect peptide-centric "bottom-up" proteomics. We used validated assays for proteotypic peptide surrogates of 270 human proteins to analyze plasma generated after whole blood had been kept at room temperature from 0 to 40 h to mimic delays that occur in the clinic. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of different plasma-thawing conditions on MRM-based plasma protein quantitation. We demonstrate that >90% of protein concentration measurements were unaffected by the thawing procedure and by up to 40-h delayed plasma generation, reflected by relative standard deviations (RSDs) of <30%. Of the 159 MRM assays that yielded quantitative results in 60% of the measured time points, 139 enabled a stable protein quantitation (RSD <20%), 14 showed a slight variation (RSD 20-30%), and 6 appeared unstable/irreproducible (RSD > 30%). These results demonstrate the high robustness and thus the potential for MRM-based plasma-protein quantitation to be used in a clinical setting. In contrast to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, peptide-based MRM assays do not require intact three-dimensional protein structures for an accurate and precise quantitation of protein concentrations in the original sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".