MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Joint Determination of Reactor Antineutrino Spectra from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Pu</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>239</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> Fission by Daya Bay and PROSPECT

2022· article· lv· W4212774553 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Nuclear Security AdministrationOffice of ScienceCanada First Research Excellence FundGovernment of Guangdong ProvinceCAS Center for Excellence in Particle PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaHeising-Simons FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChina RailwayHigh Energy PhysicsUniversity of Hawai'iIllinois Institute of TechnologyMinistry of EducationJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDrexel UniversityNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyUniverzita Karlova v PrazeUT-BattelleYale UniversityTemple UniversityComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaBattelleLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSpectral lineFissionJoint (building)IsotopeFission productsIsotopes of uraniumFission product yieldNuclear reactor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A joint determination of the reactor antineutrino spectra resulting from the fission of $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ and $^{239}\mathrm{Pu}$ has been carried out by the Daya Bay and PROSPECT Collaborations. This Letter reports the level of consistency of $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ spectrum measurements from the two experiments and presents new results from a joint analysis of both data sets. The measurements are found to be consistent. The combined analysis reduces the degeneracy between the dominant $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ and $^{239}\mathrm{Pu}$ isotopes and improves the uncertainty of the $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ spectral shape to about 3%. The $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ and $^{239}\mathrm{Pu}$ antineutrino energy spectra are unfolded from the jointly deconvolved reactor spectra using the Wiener-SVD unfolding method, providing a data-based reference for other reactor antineutrino experiments and other applications. This is the first measurement of the $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ and $^{239}\mathrm{Pu}$ spectra based on the combination of experiments at low- and highly enriched uranium reactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207