Provan, Iain. The Reformation and the Right Reading of Scripture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
comptes rendus 261 spaces, it was the stable sacramentality of crucifixes, frescoes, and altarpieces that consecrated confraternal oratories.Lay brothers aimed to capture that charism through patronage of all or some of this art and architecture, as we see in Rome (Kira Maye Albinsky), Rouen (Caroline Blondeau-Morizot), Florence (Douglas N. Dow), Palermo (Danielle Carrabino), and Seville (Ellen Alexandra Dooley).Any collection dedicated to exploring a new scholarly turn runs the risk of incoherence as the authors go, in Stephen Leacock's memorable phrase, "madly off in all directions." Editor Diana Bullen Presciutti has worked expertly to draw the authors and articles together, and to encourage a formal discipline that underscores their arguments and connections.A common bibliography incorporating archival and secondary sources makes this a valuable guide to the status quaestionis, while an extraordinary collection of well over one hundred maps and illustrations, many of them in colour, underscores the visual and sensory themes that connect the various pieces.Above all, they animate the central argument that tracing space, place, and motion are as important as measuring politics, kinship, and ritual when we aim to demonstrate the critical role that confraternities played in the social, physical, sensory, and psychic worlds of the early modern world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".