Assessment of the effect of methods of robotic medical rehabilitation with biofeedback on quality of life and psychoemotional status in patients after CVA with hemiparesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, to restore the functions of the affected limbs in patients who have had an ischemic stroke with movement disorders in the form of hemiparesis, non-drug methods have been actively used, including physiotherapy, physiotherapy exercises, kinesiotherapy and, especially, robotic biomechanics. The paper presents data on the effectiveness of using gait training on the BFB equipment with video gait reconstruction and biofeedback (BFB) in the late recovery period of medical rehabilitation. Material and methods. The study included 80 patients who underwent ischemic stroke with movement disorders in the form of hemiparesis with increased muscle tone by the type of spasticity. The patients were divided into 2 groups comparable in terms of clinical and functional characteristics: control group — 40 patients who received standard drug therapy and medical rehabilitation and the main group — 40 patients receiving standard drug therapy and medical rehabilitation (exercise therapy, medical massage, mechanotherapy) who were prescribed gait training with video reconstruction on a biofeedback system (BFB) «C-Mill». Subjective indicators of cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), psychoemotional defects (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire) were assessed. Results. As a result of the studies, it has been proved that the inclusion of a gait stereotype with video reconstruction on a biofeedback system (BFB) «C-Mill» in the rehabilitation training program contributes to a significantly more pronounced improvement of cognitive functions and the quality of life, as well as to a decrease in the degree of psychoemotional disorders in patients after ischemic stroke with movement disorders in the form of hemiparesis with increased muscle tone by the type of spasticity. This is confirmed by the increase in the total indicator of the MoCA scale to 26,5±0,5 points, which corresponds to the reference values. In the patients of the control group, less pronounced results were obtained; the total indicator of the MoCA scale was 25,0±1,0 points, which is lower than normal; similar dynamics was observed when studying the data of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the EQ-5D questionnaire, which indicated the quality of life improvement. Conclusion. The inclusion of gait training on a biofeedback system (BFB) «C-Mill» by the method of «imposing» in medical rehabilitation of patients after ischemic stroke with motor impairments in the form of hemiparesis with increased muscle tone contributes to a significant improvement in cognitive functions, a decrease in the level of anxiety and depression and improved quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".