A239 COMBINED CANNABINOID RECEPTOR 1 AND MU-OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONISTS SYNERGISTICALLY INHIBIT VISCERAL PAIN <i>IN VIVO</i> WITHOUT ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS OR TOLERANCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Previously we have shown that both cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) and mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists inhibit mechanosensitivity of colonic nociceptive nerves. However, it is unknown whether agonists of cannabinoid and opioid receptors have a synergistic interaction, such that very low doses of these agonists can be employed to reduce visceral pain and side effects. Aims To determine the effects of combined cannabinoid and opioid receptor agonists on visceral pain and its side effects. Methods Telemetric transmitters were surgically implanted into the abdominal cavity of C57/BL6 mice, with electrodes sutured to the external oblique muscle to measure the visceromotor response (VMR) to colorectal distention using a 4F arterial embolectomy catheter (volume range 20–80 µL). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with vehicle, arachidonyl-2’-chloroethylamide (ACEA), a selective CB1R agonist (0.3, 1, 3 mg/kg), HU-308, a selective CB2R agonist (0.3, 1, 3mg/kg), morphine, a MOR agonist (0.3, 3 mg/kg), or a combination, 30-minutes prior to distention. To assess side effects, pulse oximetry, heart rate, fecal pelleting, and locomotion (via an open-field maze) were measured. Data was analyzed with one or two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Results ACEA dose-dependently reduced VMR (P<0.01 vs. vehicle, N=5); at the 80 µL distention, reductions of 35% (P<0.01) and 62% (P<0.01) were observed for 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg respectively. In contrast, HU-308 did not reduce VMR at any dose (P=0.17, N=8). Morphine (0.3 mg/kg) did not reduce VMR (P>0.99), while a higher dose (3 mg/kg) attenuated VMR (P<0.01 vs. vehicle, N=5); reductions of 32% (P<0.01) and 61% (P<0.01) at 60 and 80 µL distentions respectively. Interestingly, a combination of sub-analgesic doses of ACEA (0.3 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) significantly reduced VMR (P<0.01 vs vehicle, N=5); compared to vehicle, VMR was reduced by 21% at 40 µL (P<0.05), 27% at 60 µL (P<0.01) and 60% at 80 µL (P<0.01). Chronic administration (2x/day for 6 days) of this combination did not alter the magnitude of its inhibitory effect (P=0.67, N=5), suggesting tolerance did not develop. While analgesic doses of morphine (3mg/kg) decreased oxygen saturation (P<0.01), heart rate (P<0.01) and fecal pelleting (i.e., GI motility; P<0.05), the sub-analgesic combination of ACEA and morphine had no effect (P>0.99 for all, N=5). Locomotion was unchanged by the agonists alone or combined (P=0.17). Conclusions A combination of sub-analgesic doses of CB1R and MOR agonists significantly inhibits visceral pain in vivo, without development of sides effects or tolerance with chronic use. Thus, combining low doses of CB1R and MOR agonists may be an effective visceral pain management strategy. Funding Agencies NSERC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".