Bibliographic record
Abstract
TherapeuticsSeptember 1, 2002Review: Antiemetic drugs reduce nausea in early pregnancyPhilip F. Hall, MDPhilip F. Hall, MDUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (P.F.H.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2002-137-2-067 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationJewell D, Young G. Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD000145 (latest version 15 Jan 2001). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11869567References1 Smellie W. Of nausea and vomiting. In: Smellie W. A Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Midwifery. London: New Sydenham Society; 1878:141-3. Google Scholar2 Korcok M. The Bendectin debate. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;123:922-8. [PMID: 7437993] Google Scholar3 Leeder JS, Spielberg SP, MacLeod SM. Bendectin: the wrong way to regulate drug availability. Can Med Assoc J. 1983;129:1085-7. [PMID: 6627167] Google Scholar4 Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ. Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2002. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (P.F.H.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails September 1, 2002Volume 137, Issue 2Page: 67KeywordsAdrenocorticotropic hormoneBirthDatabasesDiazepamDrugsFetusesGastrointestinal tractInformation storage and retrievalMouthNauseaPericardiumPregnancySigns and symptomsSocial influenceUterusVomiting ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: September 1, 2002 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".