MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212821492 · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00282.2021

Influence of uncomplicated, controlled hypertension on local heat-induced vasodilation in nonglabrous skin across the body

2022· article· en· W4212821492 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregory W. McGarr, Kelli E. King, Ashley P. Akerman, Naoto Fujii, Marcel Ruzicka, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPlateau (mathematics)VasodilationMedicineThighForearmAbdomenDorsumSkin temperatureInternal medicineCardiologyAnatomyAnesthesiaMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was 1) to examine pooled effects of hypertension on nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation during local heating across multiple nonglabrous skin regions, and 2) explore regional differences. Responses were compared between 14 participants with uncomplicated hypertension controlled with medication (7 females, 61 ± 6 yr) and 14 age-matched nonhypertensive controls (6 females; 60 ± 5 yr). Cutaneous vascular conductance, normalized to maximum vasodilation (%CVCmax), was assessed at the upper chest, abdomen, dorsal forearm, thigh, and lateral calf during local heating. Across all regions, local skin temperatures were simultaneously increased from 33°C to 42°C (1°C·10 s−1) and held until a stable heating plateau was achieved (∼40 min), followed by continuous infusion of 20 mM of NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME; ∼40 min) at all sites until a stable l-NAME plateau was achieved. The difference between heating and l-NAME plateaus was defined as the NO-contribution. Statistical equivalence for each heating phase was determined based on equivalence bounds of ±10%CVCmax for between-group differences. Pooled (all-regions) %CVCmax responses were equivalent for baseline (two one-sided t tests; P < 0.001), heating plateau ( P = 0.002), l-NAME plateau ( P = 0.028), and NO-contribution ( P = 0.003). For individual regions, responses were equivalent at baseline for the abdomen, thigh, and calf, the heating plateau for the thigh, and the l-NAME plateau for the calf (all P < 0.05). Conversely, the calf heating plateau was lower in the hypertension group ( t test; P < 0.05). Local heat-induced cutaneous vasodilation was statistically equivalent between individuals with uncomplicated, controlled hypertension, and nonhypertensive age-matched adults when pooled across multiple skin sites. Conversely, individual between-region comparisons were generally too variable to permit definitive conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207