MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212834060 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.086

A87 CHANGES IN CLINICIAN KNOWLEDGE, COMFORT, PREPAREDNESS, AND ATTITUDES ABOUT ALCOHOL USE DISORDER AND CIRRHOSIS AFTER A BRIEF EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION

2022· article· en· W4212834060 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emily Johnson, S. Monty Ghosh, Vijay Daniels, Puneeta Tandon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacy and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePreparednessBrief interventionPsychological interventionReferralIntervention (counseling)Family medicineSession (web analytics)Nursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is increasing in prevalence and has a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality in people with cirrhosis. The use of screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and relapse prevention medications (e.g. acamprosate) are recommended by recent guidelines. Unfortunately, many clinicians report insufficient training to feel confident using these interventions Aims We aimed to compare the effect of a brief educational intervention on AUD knowledge, comfort, attitudes, and preparedness in clinicians who provide care to patients with cirrhosis. Methods Clinicians were invited to participate in a 1.5-hour educational session conducted by a hepatologist and addiction medicine specialist. The session included information about SBIRT and pharmacotherapy. Pre-training knowledge, comfort, and practice behaviors were assessed using previously published questions. Baseline attitudes were measured using the Short Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Perception Questionnaire. Participants were invited to repeat the questionnaires immediately post-training and statistical analysis conducted. Results Eighty-two clinicians attended the session. Among the 38 attendees who completed both the pre- and post-questionnaires, 34% were GIs/internists, 45% were family medicine physicians, and the remainder (21%) did not specify or were not prescribers. Scores for self-reported intention and preparedness to treat AUD, comfort, and knowledge improved significantly from the pre-training phase. Attitudes also improved from the pre-training phase, with significant improvements in the SAAPPQ subscales of role adequacy (p=0.03) and motivation (p=0.04). Conclusions Recognizing the small sample size, a brief educational session demonstrated promising results in the promotion of knowledge, attitudes, preparedness, and comfort for clinicians managing AUD in patients with cirrhosis. Feedback from these sessions will be used to design an accredited educational series for roll-out in 2022. Funding Agencies Alberta Innovates Health Solutions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPharmacy and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207