Integração social de refugiados no Brasil e no Canadá em perspectiva comparada : Colombianos em São Paulo e em Ontário
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through a comparison between Brazil and Canada, this thesis seeks to understand Colombians refugees strategies on the different forms of integration in destination societies such as Brazil and Canada, studying them from their experiences in the regions of So Paulo and Ontario and using, for this, the view of the interviewees in relation to the defining criteria of integration as the markers and means (employment, housing, health and education); Social connections; Facilitators (language and security) and rights & citizenship (foundations) of Strang e Ager's theory (2008) and qualitatively analyzing the integration policies and resources allocated to them as refugees and refugee seekers. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with Colombian refugees and refugee applicants seeking to understand their narratives about the host structure and their own agency capacity in this process. The thesis works on the premise that the integration of refugees and asylum-seekers is a dynamic, multifaceted and two-way process, constantly changing, resulting from quite different influences. Hence, the hypothesis is that the social integration of refugees and asylum-seekers depends more on resources and integration policies structured for this purpose than on the agency capacity of individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it