A31 OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING REPEAT VIDEOCAPSULE ENDOSCOPY (VCE) PRESENTING WITH OBSCURE GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING (OGIB)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Videocapsule Endoscopy (VCE) as well as balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) are useful tools in the diagnosis and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). There is limited data assessing the diagnostic yield of VCE in subjects with OGIB according to different subtypes: 1) obscure overt 2) inactive overt and 3) active overt. Aims We evaluated the diagnostic yield and outcomes of patients undergoing a second VCE in OGIB. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent more than one VCE completed at the University of Alberta from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2021. Demographic and background information was collected including previous endoscopy results, cross-sectional imaging, and subsequent interventions. Patient data was analyzed according to subtype of OGIB at presentation. Results During the study period, there were 59 subjects who met inclusion criteria. The indication for VCE was recurrent iron deficiency anemia (IDA), active OGIB, and/or inactive OGIB in 38 subjects. The median time to VCE after initial endoscopic evaluation was 61 days. Median age of cases was 61.5 years and 49% were female. Initial VCE had clinically significant positive findings in 68% of cases (Table 1). The diagnostic yield was 75%, 56% and 74% in active OGIB, inactive OGIB, and IDA, respectively. Active bleeding or fresh blood was present in 33% of VCEs for active OGIB compared to 11% of inactive OGIB and 13% of subjects with IDA. At second VCE investigation, there were positive findings in 42% of cases. Findings on second VCE differed from initial VCE in 17 of 38 cases. Findings that changed clinical management were found in 76% of patients after first and second VCE. BAEs were performed in 20 subjects after VCE, with therapeutics applied in 75%. The most common findings were arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (65%) and erosions/ulcers (15%). Conclusions The diagnostic yield of VCE is high in appropriately selected patients and did not significantly differ in patients with IDA, active, and inactive OGIB. Serial VCE is appropriate for the investigation of suspected recurrent small bowel bleeding when initial workup is nondiagnostic. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".