MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4212853971 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.080

A81 TRANSITION PRACTICES FROM PEDIATRIC TO ADULT CARE OF CHILDREN LIVING WITH CROHN’S DISEASE IN QUEBEC

2022· article· en· W4212853971 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rui Gong, R Kafyeke, Bilguissou Bah, Audrey Weber, Maxime Morsa, C Deslandres, Prévost Jantchou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatricsDiseaseLogistic regressionAdult careResidenceYoung adultCrohn's diseaseGerontologyDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Nearly 25% of Crohn’s disease cases are diagnosed during childhood. Among them, several adolescents may have extensive or complex disease implying specific needs during transition to adult care. Aims The primary aim was to describe current transition practices from pediatric to adult care in patients diagnosed with Crohn’s disease at CHU Sainte-Justine. The secondary aim was to determine factors that influenced the type of adult health centers (academic vs non-academic) to which patients were referred. Methods This single center study included patients diagnosed with Crohn’s disease at CHU Sainte-Justine between 2009 and 2019. Adult centers were separated into five categories: academic centers in Montreal (CHU-Mtl) and outside of Montreal (CHU), non-academic centers in Montreal (CHG-Mtl) and outside of Montreal (CHG), and other centers. The following factors influencing the transfer to an academic center were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model: age at diagnosis, gender, disease location, disease activity: relapses, hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, and place of residence. Results A total of 366 patients were included: 44% female, median (IQR) age at transfer 18.0 (17.9–18.4). Among them, 169 (48%) were transferred to CHU-Mtl, 144 (39%) to CHG, 22(6%) to CHU, 4 (1%) to CHG-Mtl, 27 (7%) to other centers. There was a significant increase in the annual number of patients referred to CHG and CHU-Mtl across the decade, compared to other centers. Patients transferred to CHU-Mtl had more relapses per year (mean (SD) 0.8 (0.5) versus patients transferred to CHU, CHG and CHG-Mtl, p=0.0348), and 57% (N=97) of patients sent to CHU-Mtl had already visited the ER, as compared to 54%, 40% and 25% for CHU, CHG and CHG-Mtl respectively (p=0.0258). However, gender, age at diagnosis, maintenance treatment, number and duration of hospitalisations, extraintestinal manifestations, perianal inflammation or extensive disease location did not correlate with the type of adult center. Place of residence played a role in the choice of adult center: 56% (N= 95) of patients transferred to CHU-Mtl lived in Montreal (p<0.0001). Conclusions Clinical evolution and disease burden have an impact on the type of adult center. Efforts should be put to understand patient factors associated with the transfer to an academic vs non-academic center, for a better utilization of healthcare resources and adequate patient quality of life during transition. Funding Agencies NonePrincipal researcher funds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→