MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212862992 · doi:10.52845/jmrhs/2022-5-2-3

Explore and Develop a Culturally Adopted Behavioral Psycho EducationalFamilyIntervention for Caregivers of Schizophrenic Patients inEgyptian Context

2022· article· en· W4212862992 on OpenAlexaff
Rasha Wahid, Eilean Victoria Lazarus Rathinasamy

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Psychological interventionIntervention (counseling)SWOT analysisPsychologyFocus groupExcellenceNiceFamily caregiversSystematic reviewMedicineNursingPsychiatryMEDLINESociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Schizophrenia is a severe enduring psychotic illness that has a profound impact on the life of the sufferer and imposes a heavy burden on their families and the community.Family interventions (FIs) are the accepted model for addressing caregivers' needs for support and information.However, there are considerable variations in their content and application.The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recommended that FIs should be adapted when they are delivered to non-Western populations.To date, there are few published studies, which examine FIs in the Egyptian context.Aim: To explore and develop a culturally adopted behavioral psycho educational family intervention for caregivers of schizophrenic patients in Egyptian context.Results: Four components were identified as the most frequently used out of the systematic review.Deep structure was adopted for cultural adaption.SWOT analysis identified areas of uncertainty regarding acceptability of the components.Focus group members recommended modifications to the components of the intervention to ensure its accept-ability and feasibility in the local setting.Data synthesis was conducted and the intervention was designed.Methodology: Development phase involved four stages: 1).Iden-tifying the strategies used for the cultural adaptation of FIs in non-Western cultures 2).Identifying the key components of FIs tested in the studies included in the Cochrane systematic review 3).A SWOT analysis to identify the strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats for the potential components (4).A focus group study involving caregivers and health professionals to explore the acceptability and feasibility of delivering FI in the Egyptian context.Data synthesis determined the design of the proposed intervention according to the findings obtained from the previous stages.Results: Four components were identified as the most frequently used out of the systematic review.Deep structure was adopted for cultural adaption.SWOT analysis identified areas of uncertainty regarding acceptability of the components.Focus group members recommended modifications to the components of the intervention to ensure its acceptability and feasibility in the local setting.Data synthesis was conducted and the intervention was designed.Conclusion : This study provides evidence of the potential efficiency and acceptability of a culturally sensitive FI for caregivers of people with schizophrenia in Egypt.However, more work needs to be done to overcome the practical challenges and test the feasibility of the intervention in more rigorous way.Also, the efficacy of the intervention needs more rigorous investigation in the context of a small scale RCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch ReviewSame topicFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFrench-language works237,207