MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4212900834 · doi:10.1007/s40140-022-00516-2

From Theory to Practice: An International Approach to Establishing Prehabilitation Programmes

2022· review· en· W4212900834 on OpenAlexaffabout
June Davis, Stefan J van Rooijen, Chloe Grimmett, Malcolm West, Anna Campbell, Rashami Awasthi, Gerrit D. Slooter, Michael P. W. Grocott, Franco Carli, Sandy Jack

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent anesthesiology reports · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsPrehabilitationAnesthesiologyPain medicineMedicineMedical educationPhysical therapyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.184
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.126
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1840.126
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0110.051
Scholarly communication0.0270.018
Open science0.0070.027
Research integrity0.0070.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent anesthesiology reports→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→