The effectiveness of brief self-regulation couple therapy (srct) on reducing marital covert relational aggression, changing of communication patterns and reduction of alexithymia among conflicting couples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: There are many unsuccessful marriages and marital relationships which spouses do not divorce for various reasons. The effectiveness of brief self-regulatory couple therapy (SRCT) on different variables has been confirmed. But the research that checking the effectiveness of short-term self-regulatory couple therapy (SRCT) on reducing latent marital communication aggression, changing communication patterns, and reducingAlexithymiain conflicting couples has been neglected. Aims: This research conducted with the aim of investigate the effectiveness of couple therapy based on brief self-regulation on reducing marital covert relational aggression, changing communication patterns reduction of alexithymia among conflicting couples. Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental pretest-posttest with a testifier group. The statistical population of this study was maladapted couples referring to Bijar city counseling centers (2 centers) in 2019. By purposive sampling method, 30 couples (60 people) were selected as a statistical sample. For the experimental group, the treatment protocol (Halford, 2001) was performed as a group and one session per week (8 sessions in total) While the group did not receive any treatment. The Covert Relational Aggression Scale (Nelson and Cowell, 2006), Communication Patterns (Christensen and Heavey, 1990) and Toronto Emotional Dysfunction (Bugby, Taylor, and Parker) were used to collect data.SPSS-21 software was used to analyze the data and multivariate analysis of covariance was used at the inferential level. Results: The results of analysis of covariance showed that there was a significant difference between the post-test of the experimental and control groups in terms of dependent variables (latent marital communication aggression, emotional insufficiency and mutually constructive communication patterns, reciprocal avoidance, expectation / withdrawal) (p<0/000). Conclusion: brief self-regulatory couple therapy (SRCT) reduced latent marital communication aggression and emotional insufficiency and improved couples communication patterns. Based on the results of the present study Psychologists working in training and counseling centers to use this treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".