MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212911079 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac008

Pyeloduodenal Fistula in Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis

2022· article· en· W4212911079 on OpenAlexaff
Grace Wang, Parul Tandon, Christopher Teshima

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXanthogranulomatous pyelonephritisFistulaMedicineRadiologyInternal medicineNephrectomyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 48-year-old otherwise healthy woman with recurrent urinary tract infections presented to the emergency department with 1 month of fever and flank tenderness. Three months prior, she was diagnosed with a 3-cm right staghorn stone; interventions were postponed due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was attempted: unexpectedly, dye injected into the ureter filled the bowel on fluoroscopy, suggesting a renal-enteric fistula (a). Computed tomography demonstrated xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP), a rare chronic pyelonephritis, with perinephric stranding abutting a thickened duodenum. Endoscopy was performed to plan for intervention, revealing a fistulous opening in the second segment of the duodenum (b). Pyeloduodenal fistula is an extremely rare, late-presenting sequela of XGP (1). Definitive management traditionally involves primary surgical fistula closure with nephrectomy (2). Endoscopy facilitates fistula localization; furthermore, with the advent of Over-the-Scope-Clips (OTSC) for fistula closure, endoscopic approaches should be considered first as a safe, feasible alternative to surgery. There are two reported cases of pyeloduodenal fistula closure using OTSC (3,4). Endoscopic intervention was considered here; however, given the patient’s significant renal involvement, she underwent nephrectomy with concurrent surgical clipping of the fistulous tract. Pathology revealed abscesses and necrosis infiltrating the renal parenchyma. Post-operatively, she required parenteral antibiotics and remained well 6 months post-discharge. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of their information and imaging without any identifying information. All authors have made substantial contributions to all of the following (1) conception and design, (2) drafting and revising the text, and (3) final approval of the version to be submitted. The authors have no personal or financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicInfectious Disease Case Reports and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207