MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212911932 · doi:10.1161/jaha.121.024765

American Heart Association EPI|Lifestyle Scientific Sessions: 2021 Meeting Highlights

2022· article· en· W4212911932 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingLarner College of Medicine, University of VermontUniversity of VermontVirginia Commonwealth UniversitySchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillYork UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityCedars-Sinai Medical CenterUniversity of PittsburghJohns Hopkins UniversityEmory University
KeywordsObservational studyEpidemiologyPublic healthAlternative medicineRandomized controlled trialCardiovascular healthMEDLINEClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

he annual American Heart Association (AHA) EPI|Lifestyle Scientific Sessions for 2021 was held in a virtual format from May 20 to 21, 2021.The AHA EPI|Lifestyle Scientific Sessions were combined meetings of the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention (EPI) and the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health.The 2021 conference's theme was Health Equity and Social Justice and highlighted keynote sessions on health equity, structural racism, and COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) research.Results from observational studies and randomized controlled trials were presented at the meeting, including research on topics such as social determinants of health, maternal and child health, omics, nutrition, physical activity, and sleep.Participants of the virtual conference included clinicians, public health professionals, and trainees.Over 600 people took part in this year's event, which hosted 212 poster presentations, 66 moderated posters, and 80 oral presentations.The meeting chair representing the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health was Dr Kristie Lancaster from New York University, and Dr Pamela Lutsey from the University of Minnesota represented the EPI council.The vice chairs were Dr Marie-France Hivert from

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2270.128

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart AssociationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207