Neuropsychiatric Inventory–Questionnaire Assessed Nighttime Behaviors in Cognitively Asymptomatic Patients with Pathologically Confirmed Alzheimer’s Disease Predict More Rapid Cognitive Deterioration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The temporal relationship between sleep, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and cognitive impairment remains to be further elucidated. OBJECTIVE: First, we aim to determine whether the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) assessed nighttime behaviors prior to cognitive decline influence the rate of cognitive deterioration in pathologically confirmed AD, and second, to assess the possible interactions with APOE allele and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). METHODS: The rate of cognitive decline between cognitively asymptomatic participants from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center who eventually received a neuropathologic diagnosis of AD with (+NTB) or without (-NTB) nighttime behaviors were compared using independent samples t-test. Participants were stratified by APOE carrier and CAA status. Demographic and patient characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics, and the independent samples t-test was used for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. The significance level was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: The rate of cognitive decline was greater in +NTB (n = 74; 3.30 points/year) than -NTB (n = 330; 2.45 points/year) (p = 0.016), even if there was no difference in cognitive status at onset. This difference was restricted to APOE ɛ4 carriers (p = 0.049) and positive CAA participants (p = 0.020). Significance was not reached in non-carriers (p = 0.186) and negative CAA (p = 0.364). APOE and CAA were not differentially distributed between the NTB groups. CONCLUSION: NPI-Q assessed nighttime behaviors, a surrogate for sleep disturbances, are associated with more rapidly deteriorating cognition in patients with AD neuropathology who are also carriers of APOE ɛ4 or show CAA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".