MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Urinary Retention In Early Foley Catheter Removal After Colorectal Surgery

2017· preprint· en· W4212928495 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amandeep Ghuman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoleyFoley catheterUrinary retentionMedicineUrinary systemColorectal surgeryUrinary catheterSurgeryUrinary catheterizationCatheterInternal medicineAbdominal surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urinary retention in early Foley catheter removal after colorectal surgery. A. Ghuman, N. Kasteel, C. Brown, A. Karimuddin, M. Raval, T. Phang. From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.Prolonged catheterization causes increased urinary tract infections (UTIs), but early removal after surgery is linked to increased urinary retention. In our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal surgery, we began removal of the Foley catheter on postoperative day 2. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of urinary retention and infection and potentially contributing factors in male patients. This was a single academic centre retrospective cohort study with male patients 50 years of age and older undergoing elective colorectal surgery from January 2015 to February 2017. Females, prior prostate surgery, tumour extension to bladder or prostate and/or intraoperative urethral or bladder injury were excluded. As of 2016, prophylactic tamsulosin 0.4mg daily was given 3 days before surgery and continued until discharge. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine potential risk factors for urinary retention, including age, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, history of voiding difficulty, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open, lesion location, operative time American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, intraoperative fluid balance, epidural, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak and ileus, and prophylactic tamsulosin use. One hundred and eighteen patients were included in the analysis, 62 without and 56 with prophylactic tamsulosin. Urinary retention rate was 12.71% and UTI rate was 5.13%. Operative duration and ileus were found to be independent risk factors for urinary retention with adjusted odds ratios of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03, p<0.01) and 4.96 (95% CI 1.45-16.94, p<0.01) respectively. There was no significant association with age, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, history of voiding difficulty, MIS versus open, lesion location, ASA score, intraoperative fluid balance, PCA, anastomotic leak or prophylactic tamsulosin. The incidence of urinary retention and UTI at our institution is high. Urinary retention was associated with operative duration and ileus, which could potentially be explained by more difficult cases. Urinary retention was not associated with rectal lesion location or prophylactic tamrulosin. However, sample size is small and further investigation is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→