Cold War Allies: Commonwealth and United States Naval Cooperation in Asian Waters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'interaction entre les gouvernements canadiens, australiens, des tats-Unis et du Royaume-Uni au cours de la guerre froide en Asie a t le plus souvent caractrise par un dsaccord sur les objectifs et la politique des tats-Unis. Tel n'tait pas le cas, cependant, avec l'exprience oprationnelle des marines de ces pays. En effet, les liens tisss entre les chefs des marines et des commandants de combat pendant les guerres de Core et du Vitnam ainsi que l'effort pour ramener la stabilit en Extrme-Orient, ont eu un impact positif sur la solidarit allie et sur les mesures de scurit collectives la fin du 20me et au 21me sicles. Ce document traite de la nature de la relation oprationnelle entre les quatre marines dans la guerre de Core; des actions navales amricaines, britanniques et australiennes dans la gestion des conflits en Asie du Sud-Est au cours des annes 50 et 60; l'exprience sous feu de la Marine royale australienne et la Marine amricaine; et l'interaction vers la fin de la guerre froide pour faire face la la prsence et la monte en puissance de la marine sovitique dans les eaux asiatiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".