Cold War Allies: Commonwealth and United States Naval Cooperation in Asian Waters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'interaction entre les gouvernements canadiens, australiens, des États-Unis et du Royaume-Uni au cours de la guerre froide en Asie a été le plus souvent caractérisée par un désaccord sur les objectifs et la politique des États-Unis.Tel n'était pas le cas, cependant, avec l'expérience opérationnelle des marines de ces pays.En effet, les liens tissés entre les chefs des marines et des commandants de combat pendant les guerres de Corée et du Viêtnam ainsi que l'effort pour ramener la stabilité en Extrême-Orient, ont eu un impact positif sur la solidarité alliée et sur les mesures de sécurité collectives à la fin du 20ème et au 21ème siècles.Ce document traite de la nature de la relation opérationnelle entre les quatre marines dans la guerre de Corée; des actions navales américaines, britanniques et australiennes dans la gestion des conflits en Asie du Sud-Est au cours des années 50 et 60; l'expérience sous feu de la Marine royale australienne et la Marine américaine; et l'interaction vers la fin de la guerre froide pour faire face à la la présence et la montée en puissance de la marine soviétique dans les eaux asiatiques.The navies of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand operated side by side with the navy of the United States throughout much of the Cold War in Asia.Despite often contentious policy disagreements between Washington and Commonwealth capitals, their navies functioned at high levels of coordination, interoperability, and efficiency.While the Korean War marked the high point of this interaction, the Royal Australian Navy fought off Vietnam with the U.S. Seventh Fleet and all of the Commonwealth navies took part in multinational exercises during the long Cold War.In this paper, the author addresses in detail the cooperation between the U.S. Navy and Commonwealth navies during the Korean war, with brief coverage of similar cooperation during the Vietnam War and the last years of the Cold War. Allied Naval Response to Communist AggressionThe Commonwealth and U.S. navies, allies in World War II, joined together once again in the first armed conflict of the so-called Cold War -the Korean War.Soon after North Korean Communist forces invaded the Republic of Korea on 25 June 1950, the United Nations Security Council voted in support of an armed response by member nations to the The Northern Mariner/Le marin du nord XXIV, Nos. 3 & 4 (Jul.& Oct. 2014), 214-234 Canadian Military History 23, Nos. 3 & 4 (Summer & Autumn 2014), 214-234 Cold War Allies: Commonwealth and U.S. Naval Cooperation in Asian Waters attack.President Harry S. Truman directed the U.S. Seventh Fleet, then operating from Subic Bay in the Philippines, to steam for waters off the Asian continent.Admiral Arthur W. Radford, the Pacific Fleet commander, transferred operational control of the Seventh Fleet to Commander Naval Forces, Far East, Vice Admiral C. Turner Joy.The Seventh Fleet's first mission was to prevent the conflict in Korea from spreading throughout the Far East by warning Mao Tse-tung's Chinese Communist government in Beijing not to invade the island of Taiwan occupied by Chiang Kai-shek's Chinese Nationalist government.Aircraft carrier Valley Forge, heavy cruiser Rochester, and eight destroyers steamed just to the east of Taiwan and the carrier's planes made a show of force, flying in broad daylight between the island and the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".