Claude-Adrien Helvétius, <i> Œuvres complètes, <scp>iii</scp> : Poésies, recueil de notes, correspondance </i> . Textes édités, présentés et annotés par Gerhardt Stenger, David Smith et Jonas Steffen HelvétiusClaude-Adrien, <i>Œuvres complètes, III: Poésies, recueil de notes, correspondance</i> . Textes édités, présentés et annotés par StengerGerhardt, SmithDavid et SteffenJonas. Avec l’assistance de DupieuxTomy. (L’Âge des Lumières, 100.) Paris: Honoré Champion, 2020. 722 pp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The third and last volume of the Champion edition of Helvétius’s complete works brings together verse epistles, a poem, and a notebook, in addition to some three hundred letters. The letters and relevant annotation are largely reprinted from David Smith’s masterful five-volume edition of the Correspondance générale d’Helvétius (Toronto and Oxford: University of Toronto Press and Voltaire Foundation, 1981–2004). Nineteen unpublished letters, however, are added to those known from Smith’s edition. Addressed, for the most part, to Anne-Catherine de Ligniville d’Autricourt, Helvétius’s wife, these letters fill several gaps in one of the most passionate epistolary exchanges of the eighteenth century: as tender and affectionate as some of Diderot’s letters to Sophie Volland, they are also rich in inside jokes and erotic allusions, an aspect that brings them closer to some of the billets exchanged between Voltaire and Mme Denis. Gerhardt Stenger’s edition also reproduces in full twenty-three letters addressed to...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.045 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".