Final report on CCQM-K167: carbon isotope delta measurements of vanillin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Main text The CCQM Isotope Ratio Working Group (IRWG) determined that an additional key comparison of carbon isotope delta measurements was required to capture the progress of this field. Vials containing 0.25 mg of vanillin were prepared at NRC, and evaluated for bottle-to-bottle homogeneity prior to distribution to the eight participating institutes. Participants were able to choose any suitable method and reference materials for carbon isotope delta measurements, and report a carbon isotope delta value and the associated uncertainty, and analysis details. To determine the key comparison reference value (KCRV) and its associated uncertainty, the NRC in collaboration with the NIST, developed a multivariate Bayesian random laboratory effects model, which also incorporates the uncertainty due to bottle-to-bottle homogeneity and any correlations between the reported results that arise due to the use of common reference materials. The KCRV for this study was determined to be -25.833 ‰ relative to the VPDB, with associated uncertainty of 0.028 ‰, and expanded uncertainty of 0.056 ‰ (k=2). All the results reported by the participants in this study were considered equivalent to the KCRV. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.051 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".