A56 TUFT CELL RESPONSES DURING ACUTE- AND LATE-STAGE <i>GIARDIA</i> INFECTION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Epithelial tuft cells can detect and respond to enteric infections and appear to help clear some intestinal parasites. Through tuft cell luminal surface receptors, tuft cells can sense ligands directly supplied by a parasite, or indirectly via excretory/secretory products. We hypothesize that microbiome alterations may also modulate tuft cell-derived gut responses. Tuft cells release the alarmin cytokine IL-25 which, upon acting on type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), ultimately lead to tuft and goblet cell hyperplasia. Upon helminth infections, tuft and goblet cell hyperplasia occurred concurrently, and coincided with the peak of infection. The role of tuft cells in infections with the enteric protozoan parasite Giardia sp. is unknown. The aim of our study is to characterize how tuft cells may be implicated in the pathophysiology of giardiasis, in an attempt to uncover novel regulatory pathways of intestinal physiology. Aims In this study, we aim to characterise the tuft cell response to Giardia infection during acute and late stages of infection and to assess goblet cell hyperplasia. Methods 5–7-week-old C57BL/6 mice and tuft cell-deficient mice ( Pou2f3-/-) were orally gavaged with 5x104Giardia muris trophozoites and scarified at days 4, 11 and 21 post-infection. Parasite burden was assessed in the duodenum. Immunofluorescence (IF) staining of doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1) – a marker of tuft cells – was performed on C57BL/6 mice jejunum tissue sections and the number of tuft cells was quantified. Goblet cells were quantified in PAS/AB-stained jejunum sections. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on Dclk1, the epithelial secretory cell transcription factor Atoh1, and the mucus gene Muc2. Results G. muris infected C57BL/6 mice displayed high parasite load at days 4 ( p&lt;0.05) and 11 ( p&lt;0.05), with no or low parasite burden at day 21 ( p&lt;0.05). Pou2f3-/- mice showed less robust parasite burden at days 4 and 11, and similar low parasite burden at day 21, compared to WT mice. At day 21, tuft cell (DCLK1+) counts ( p&lt;0.05) and Dclk1 mRNA expression levels were increased in Giardia infected mice in the jejunum. Goblet cell number and Atoh1 and Muc2 expression were increased at day 4 post-infection. Conclusions The data demonstrate that tuft cells expand late in Giardia infection, suggesting that upon parasite infection, tuft cells may possess roles in tissue repair or clearance of infection. Tuft cell-deficient mice ( Pou2f3-/-) had lower parasite burden early in Giardia infection, counter-intuitively suggesting that tuft cells may facilitate trophozoite colonization, further highlighting the novelty of these findings. The crosstalk between tuft cells, Giardia, and other host responses during acute and late stages of infection remain to be fully characterised. Funding Agencies NSERC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".