A128 PATIENT CHARACTERIZATION AND ASSESSMENT OF REMISSION RATES IN CHILDREN WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS AFTER INITIAL TREATMENT AND 1-YEAR POST-DIAGNOSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune- or antigen-mediated esophageal disorder characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. With incidence rates rapidly increasing, EoE is the leading cause of food bolus impaction and the second leading cause of chronic esophagitis. The treatment of EoE includes both induction and maintenance therapy to prevent complications including esophageal fibrosis and strictures. Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE, the natural history and long-term management of the disease remains poorly understood. Aims To describe the clinical characterization of children with EoE, and to assess remission rates after initial treatment and 1-year post-diagnosis. Methods In this ongoing, single-center retrospective study, the electronic medical charts of children newly diagnosed with EoE between January 2017-March 2021 participating in the EoE-AHEAD Registry study were reviewed. Children aged 6 months-18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of EoE based on consensus guidelines and receiving outpatient care at the SickKids EoE clinic were included. Results A total of 37 children with a median age of 11 years (IQR: 4.5, 12.5) were included, the majority of which were male (86.5%). Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. On initial treatment, 2.7% of children were on an elemental diet, 18.9% on a food elimination diet, 40.5% on proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, 16.2% on topical steroids, 8.1% on systemic steroids, and 13.5% on a combination therapy. Of the 30 children with a second endoscopy (mean interval since diagnosis of 6.1 months (3.9)), 30% achieved histological remission after the initial treatment (see Figure 1). Of the 14 children with a one-year follow-up endoscopy, 14.2% were in remission, 3 of which had relapsed. No significant differences in treatment modality were found between those who achieved remission and those who did not. Conclusions This is the first Canadian registry study to examine the longitudinal outcomes of EoE in a pediatric setting. Our preliminary results show that only 30% of children achieved histological remission following first-line treatment. The choice of initial therapy varied, although the majority of patients (62.2%) were prescribed a PPI and/or a topical steroid. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying different disease phenotypes to develop personalized therapeutic approaches for the management of EoE. Funding Agencies SickKids start-up funds (JM Hulst) and the Comprehensive Research Experience for Medical Students (CREMS) Program
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".