MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212973302 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.127

A128 PATIENT CHARACTERIZATION AND ASSESSMENT OF REMISSION RATES IN CHILDREN WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS AFTER INITIAL TREATMENT AND 1-YEAR POST-DIAGNOSIS

2022· article· en· W4212973302 on OpenAlexaffabout
S Da Silva, Karin Bortolin, N Afzal, P Marcon, Jessie M. Hulst

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEosinophilic esophagitisMedicinePediatricsInternal medicineDysphagiaIncidence (geometry)Proton-pump inhibitorEsophagitisGastroenterologyDiseaseSurgeryReflux

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune- or antigen-mediated esophageal disorder characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. With incidence rates rapidly increasing, EoE is the leading cause of food bolus impaction and the second leading cause of chronic esophagitis. The treatment of EoE includes both induction and maintenance therapy to prevent complications including esophageal fibrosis and strictures. Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE, the natural history and long-term management of the disease remains poorly understood. Aims To describe the clinical characterization of children with EoE, and to assess remission rates after initial treatment and 1-year post-diagnosis. Methods In this ongoing, single-center retrospective study, the electronic medical charts of children newly diagnosed with EoE between January 2017-March 2021 participating in the EoE-AHEAD Registry study were reviewed. Children aged 6 months-18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of EoE based on consensus guidelines and receiving outpatient care at the SickKids EoE clinic were included. Results A total of 37 children with a median age of 11 years (IQR: 4.5, 12.5) were included, the majority of which were male (86.5%). Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. On initial treatment, 2.7% of children were on an elemental diet, 18.9% on a food elimination diet, 40.5% on proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, 16.2% on topical steroids, 8.1% on systemic steroids, and 13.5% on a combination therapy. Of the 30 children with a second endoscopy (mean interval since diagnosis of 6.1 months (3.9)), 30% achieved histological remission after the initial treatment (see Figure 1). Of the 14 children with a one-year follow-up endoscopy, 14.2% were in remission, 3 of which had relapsed. No significant differences in treatment modality were found between those who achieved remission and those who did not. Conclusions This is the first Canadian registry study to examine the longitudinal outcomes of EoE in a pediatric setting. Our preliminary results show that only 30% of children achieved histological remission following first-line treatment. The choice of initial therapy varied, although the majority of patients (62.2%) were prescribed a PPI and/or a topical steroid. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying different disease phenotypes to develop personalized therapeutic approaches for the management of EoE. Funding Agencies SickKids start-up funds (JM Hulst) and the Comprehensive Research Experience for Medical Students (CREMS) Program

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207