Molecular phylogenetics reveals the common species of<i>Trochus</i>(Vetigastropoda: Trochidae) found on Japanese temperate subtidal reefs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Five species of the marine gastropod genus Trochus are found on the Japanese coast. It was considered that Trochus rota was the most northerly species, whereas subtropical species, including T. histrio, were limited to the southern region. In recent years, however, several researchers have reported shells of T. histrio at higher latitudes than the previously assumed northern limit of this species. For the identification of the Japanese Trochus species, traditional shell morphological characters are insufficient. To provide better identification criteria, we performed a detailed morphological investigation and molecular analysis for Trochus individuals (n = 55) collected from a subtidal reef in Nagai, on the temperate Pacific coast of Japan. Our phylogenetic analysis, which was based on the mitochondrial DNA genes cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and 16S ribosomal RNA, shows that T. histrio, despite its relatively low genetic diversity, exhibits substantial variation in the morphology of the shell base (i.e. in the extent of red spotting on the inner part of the aperture and in the prominence of the knobs protruding along the base of the shell periphery). A shell size comparison indicates that the variation in the shell base reflects growth-associated morphological change. We found significant differences between T. histrio and T. rota in two shell characters (the number of knobs along the base of the shell periphery and shell height/width ratio) with size as a covariate. We conclude that these two species can usually be distinguished from each other by the combination of two characters: presence/absence of red spots on the inner aperture and the extent (i.e. number and prominence) of knob-like structures on the shell base. In addition, field sampling in Nagai shows that T. histrio is currently much more common than T. rota at two sites having contrasting kelp forest conditions. The diagnostic criteria presented here provide a useful basis for research on the ecology of Japanese Trochus species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".