MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Immune profiling of advanced prostate cancer harboring homologous recombination deficiency.

2022· article· en· W4212992860 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Soleimani, Sonia H.Y. Kung, Neetu Saxena, Marisa Thi, Ladan Fazli, Lucia Nappi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersProstate Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerImmune systemProstateStromal cellCD8Internal medicineOncologyCancer researchCancerPathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

163 Background: Most patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) affects up to 30% of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and is predictive of response to PARP inhibitors. The potential activity of ICI in this subset of patients is unknown and the tumour microenvironment (TME) associated with HRD is poorly understood. We used mPCa tumours of patients with known HRD alterations as a model to study clinically relevant, therapeutically targetable drivers of tumour immunology. Methods: Archival tumor tissue of patients with known germline or somatic HRD alterations enrolled in our institutional GU Biobank (n = 13) was used for immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of the following immune markers in both tumour cells (TC) and stromal lymphocytes (SL): CD8, adenosine receptor 2a (A2aR), GAL9, IL-2, LAG3, PD-L2, and TIM-3. The same markers were analyzed in untreated (n = 104), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy treated (NHT) (n = 16) tissue. Two-tailed t-test and Pearson R correlations were performed for analysis. Results: Among screened HRD alterations, BRCA1/2 were the most frequently identified ( BRCA1/2 n = 6, FANCC n = 1, FANCD2 n = 2, PALB2 n = 1, CDK12 n = 1, ATR n = 2). CD8+ cells were primarily localized in the stroma of HRD cohort specimens rather than in the glandular epithelia. The HRD cohort had higher levels of A2aR, in TC and SL (p≤0.0001 for both). When compared to the untreated cohort, PD-L2 levels were higher in SL of the HRD cohort (p≤0.05) while lower in the TC (p≤0.01). Lower levels of LAG3 were found in the HRD cohort TC compared to NHT cohort (p≤0.01). There were significantly lower levels of GAL9 in the TC of the HRD cohort compared to untreated (p < 0.0001) tumours. There were no differences in TIM-3 levels between the cohorts. Conclusions: Evaluation of stromal and tumour cell immune profiling indicates that compared to other subtypes, mPCa with HRD alteration have a unique immune profile abundant in CD8+ cell, and high in PD-L2 and A2aR expression. Not only does this indicate an immune active TME but also identifies therapeutically actionable pathways which may render clinical benefit in this patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→