Rapid GPR183-mediated recruitment of eosinophils to the lung after <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Influx of eosinophils into the lungs is typically associated with type-II responses during allergy, fungal and parasitic infections. However, we previously reported that eosinophils accumulate in lung lesions during type-I inflammatory responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in humans, macaques, and mice where they contribute to host resistance. Here we show eosinophils migrate into the lungs of macaques and mice as early as one week after Mtb-exposure. In mice this influx was CCR3 independent and instead required cell-intrinsic expression of the oxysterol-receptor GPR183, which is highly expressed on human and macaque eosinophils. Murine eosinophils interacted directly with bacilli-laden alveolar macrophages, which upregulated the oxysterol-synthesizing enzyme Ch25h, and eosinophil recruitment was impaired in Ch25h deficient mice. Our findings show that eosinophils are among the first cells from circulation to sense and respond to Mtb infection of alveolar macrophages and reveal a novel role for GPR183 in the migration of eosinophils into lung tissue. HIGHLIGHTS In mice and macaques eosinophils accumulate early in Mtb-infected lungs preceding neutrophils Eosinophils interact with Mtb-infected cells in the alveoli in mice Early pulmonary eosinophil migration occurs independently of CCR3 in mice Early lung migration in mice requires Ch25h and eosinophil-intrinsic GPR183 expression
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".