Analysis of Stresses and Strains in Stainless Steel 316 L Tubes Subjected to Die Expansion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract SS316 L finned tubes are becoming very popular in high-pressure heat exchangers and particularly in CO2 cooler applications. Due to the high pressures present during operation, these tubes require an accurate residual stress evaluation generated by the die expansion process. Die expansion of air cooler fin tubes creates not only high stresses that can surpass the ultimate tensile strength when combined with operation stresses but microcracks during expansion when the process is not well controlled. This research work aims to study the elastic-plastic behavior and estimate the residual stress state of fin tubes subjected to the die expansion process. The stresses and deformations of the expanded SS316 L tube are analyzed numerically using the finite element method. The expansion and contraction process are modeled considering the elastic–plastic material behavior for different die sizes. The maximum longitudinal, tangential, and contact stresses are evaluated to verify the critical stress state of the joint during the expansion process. The importance of the material behavior in evaluating the residual stresses using kinematic and isotropic hardening is addressed. Finally, an experiment was conducted to assess the tangential and longitudinal strains of a 3/8 in. stainless steel tube subjected to expansion with an oval-shaped die.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it