A GNN-based Multi-task Learning Framework for Personalized Video Search
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Watching online videos has become more and more popular and users tend to watch videos based on their personal tastes and preferences. Providing a customized ranking list to maximize the user's satisfaction has become increasingly important for online video platforms. Existing personalized search methods (PSMs) train their models with user feedback information (e.g. clicks). However, we identified that such feedback signals may indicate attractiveness but not necessarily indicate relevance in video search. Besides, the click data and user historical information are usually too sparse to train a good PSM, which is different from the conventional Web search containing users' rich historical information. To address these concerns, in this paper we propose a multi-task graph neural network architecture for personalized video search (MGNN-PVS) that can jointly model user's click behaviour and the relevance between queries and videos. To relieve the sparsity problem and learn better representation for users, queries and videos, we develop an efficient and novel GNN architecture based on neighborhood sampling and hierarchical aggregation strategy by leveraging their different hops of neighbors in the user-query and query-document click graph. Extensive experiments on a major commercial video search engine show that our model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art PSMs, which illustrates the effectiveness of our proposed framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".