MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Atezolizumab (atezo) with or without Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients (pts) with high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): Results from a phase Ib/II study.

2022· article· en· W4213040106 on OpenAlexaff
Noah M. Hahn, Gary D. Steinberg, Kelly Stratton, Ryan Kopp, Alexander Sankin, Eila C. Skinner, Kamal S. Pohar, Benjamin A. Gartrell, Song Pham, Deepali Rishipathak, Sanjeev Mariathasan, Nicole N. Davarpanah, Corey Carter, Brant A. Inman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortBladder cancerAtezolizumabUrologyCystectomyInternal medicineCarcinoma in situCancerOncologySurgeryImmunotherapyPembrolizumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

493 Background: Standard treatment (tx) for high-risk NMIBC is transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by BCG induction and maintenance. However, ≈50% of pts experience recurrence and/or progression after tx and may be ineligible for or refuse cystectomy. The PD-L1/PD-1 pathway may be involved with immune escape in NMIBC following BCG exposure. Here, we report results of atezo (anti–PD-L1) ± BCG in BCG-unresponsive, high-risk NMIBC. Methods: This multicenter study (NCT02792192) enrolled pts with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with carcinoma in situ who had repeat TURBT. Cohort 1A and 1B pts received atezo 1200 mg IV q3w for ≤96 wk. Cohort 1B pts also received standard BCG induction (qw × 6 doses) and maintenance (qw × 3 doses at 3 mo), with optional maintenance courses at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 mo. For cohort 1B only, de-escalation was allowed for ≤3 BCG dose levels (full dose 50 mg, 66% and 33% of full dose). Co-primary outcomes were safety and complete response (CR) rate at 6 mo (6-mo bladder biopsy required). Duration of CR and 3-mo CR rate (key secondary outcomes) and 12-mo CR rate (exploratory) were also shown. Results: Cohorts 1A and 1B enrolled 12 pts each. Median age was 74 y; most pts had ECOG PS 0 (n = 7 [58%] in each cohort). At data cutoff (Sep 29, 2020), median atezo tx duration was 22.7 wk in cohort 1A and 31.6 wk in 1B. Following dose de-escalation in cohort 1B, the recommended BCG dose was 50 mg. BCG dose modification/interruption occurred in 4 pts (33%) due to an AE. The most common reason for tx discontinuation was disease recurrence or progression in both cohorts. Three pts (25%) in cohort 1A had atezo-related Gr 3 AEs (most common: maculopapular rash, n = 2); no atezo- or BCG-related Gr ≥3 AEs were seen in cohort 1B. Three dose-limiting toxicities occurred (1 [8%] in cohort 1A and 2 [17%] in cohort 1B), all reported as AEs of special interest. No Gr 4/5 AEs were reported. CRs, which appeared durable, were seen in both cohorts (Table). Conclusions: In this first report of atezo + BCG in NMIBC, atezo as mono- and combination therapy was well tolerated, with no new safety signals or tx-related deaths. Preliminary data suggested clinically meaningful activity, especially with atezo + BCG, requiring confirmation in a larger setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02792192. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→