MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A prospective, single-center, phase II randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of exercise during intravesical therapy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

2022· article· en· W4213046634 on OpenAlexaff
Fernanda Z. Arthuso, Adrian Fairey, Normand G. Boulé, Kerry S. Courneya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBladder cancerCystoscopyRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Adverse effectCancerInternal medicineUrologySurgeryUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS600 Background: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for about 75% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers. The treatment for NMIBC initially involves transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by six weeks of induction intravesical therapy. NMIBC has a high rate of recurrence (31-78%) and progression (15%). Moreover, bladder cancer and its treatments may affect patient functioning, quality of life, and increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality. Exercise is a safe and effective intervention for many cancer patients groups, however, no studies have examined exercise during intravesical therapy for NMIBC. Bladder cancer and exeRcise trAining during intraVesical thErapy (BRAVE) is the first phase II randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of exercise for NMIBC patients during intravesical therapy. An exploratory aim is to track the short-term bladder cancer recurrence and progression rates for each trial arm. Methods: BRAVE has a target sample size of 66 men or women diagnosed with NMIBC undergoing intravesical therapy with chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents. Participants are being randomly assigned to usual care or exercise intervention, which consists of three supervised, high-intensity interval training sessions/week for 12-weeks. Safety is being evaluated by any adverse events during the physical fitness assessments or exercise sessions. Feasibility will be evaluated by eligibility, recruitment, adherence, and attrition rates. Preliminary efficacy endpoints are cardiorespiratory fitness assessed by peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) at 6-week (post-intravesical therapy) and 3-month surveillance cystoscopy; and complete response (CR), defined as negative cytology, imaging, and cystoscopy and, when indicated, a negative biopsy. CR will be assessed at 3-month and one-year surveillance cystoscopy follow-up. Statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat approach. Analysis of covariance will compare between-group VO2peak differences at post-intervention (pre-cystoscopy). Study enrolment started May 24, 2021 and is ongoing. As of October 4, 2021, we have screened 17 NMIBC patients scheduled for intravesical therapy for eligibility; 16 (94%) were ineligible for medical (n = 11), language (n = 3), or location (n = 2) reasons. All the medical reasons included severe cardiovascular diseases. One eligible patient declined due to travel distance to the facility. In the face of a slower-than-expected recruitment rate, eligibility was extended to patients in the maintenance phases of treatment for NMIBC, where patients receive three weekly instillations of intravesical therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04593862.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→