MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213067470 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.170

A171 EXPLORING PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON A 12-WEEK, ONLINE STRESS REDUCTION INTERVENTION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2022· article· en· W4213067470 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ashley Hyde, Makayla Watt, Farhad Peerani, Karen Madsen, Jesse Siffledeen, Karen I. Kroeker, Andrew Kean Seng Lim, Puneeta Tandon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOptimism, Hope, and Well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThematic analysisPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialUlcerative colitisIntervention (counseling)Inflammatory bowel diseaseMeditationDiseaseQualitative researchIrritable bowel syndromeCrohn's diseasePhysical therapyStress managementClinical psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic relapsing-remitting or progressive inflammatory condition. In addition to physical symptoms, individuals with IBD experience uncertainty about their future, social isolation, and increased psychological stress. Conventional medical and surgical IBD treatment does not adequately address the the impact of psychological stress. Online stress reduction interventions may therefore be useful adjuncts to standard medical therapies for IBD. The Peace Power Pack (PPP) trial was a 12-week RCT testing a stress reduction intervention with two core components: (i) a yoga, breathwork and meditation video, and (ii) a behavior-change facilitation informed by cognitive behavioral therapy. Aims The aims of this qualitative study, which was carried out alongside the PPP trial was to: (i) explore the experience of living with IBD, (ii) understand the impacts of the PPP program, and (iii) identify potential improvements to the program. Methods Upon completion of the 12-week RCT, all intervention participants were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Interviews were analyzed through a theoretical thematic analysis process, whereby transcripts were coded, and codes then grouped into larger categories and themes. Results Of the 56 participants interviewed, 52% had CD and 48% had UC. Participants ranged in age from 23 to 73 years, were predominantly female (70%) and had been diagnosed with IBD 14.3 years ago. Three main themes (Table 1) were identified: (i) IBD as a source of stress and uncertainty, (ii) understanding the positive impacts of the stress reduction program, and (iii) suggested strategies to enhance program desirability. IBD was described as causing uncertainty, significant disruptions to daily activities, and stress. The online program was associated with a perceived reduction in IBD symptom burden, an increased ability to manage daily and disease-associated stressors, and a more positive mindset. Variation in program content and fostering connections with others in the IBD community were identified as potential strategies to enhance future programming. Conclusions This study highlights the power of the patient voice to deepen our understanding of the impact of IBD, and the potential benefit of an online stress reduction program including suggestions for iterative refinement. Table 1. Themes identified with sample quotations Funding Agencies University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, the American College of Gastroenterology and the Inflammation, Microbiome, and Alimentation: Gastrointestinal and Neuropsychiatric Effects (IMAGINE) Network CIHR grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207