Mitochondrial capture and subsequent genetic divergence generates a novel haplogroup: evidence from ancient and ongoing hybridization in mule and white-tailed deer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer) and O. hemionus (mule deer) are sympatric across much of North America. Molecular evidence suggests that up to 24% of individuals in some populations are a product of hybrid ancestry. Several studies have alluded to ancient and recent introgression between Odocoileus spp.; however, no divergence dates were proposed. Herein, phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences obtained from the mitochondrial Cytochrome b gene in 690 individuals identified three clades corresponding to black-tailed deer, white-tailed deer, or a unique combination of both white-tailed deer and mule deer. White-tailed deer and mule deer diverged from a common ancestor of approximately 3.13 mya followed by an ancient hybridization event of approximately 1.32 mya, in which the white-tailed deer mitochondrial genome was “captured” by mule deer. This hybridization event produced a novel haplogroup for white-tailed deer and mule deer located west of the Appalachian Mountains and east of the Cascade Range, south to Veracruz, Mexico, and north to the Yukon Territory, Canada. The ancestral mule deer-like mitochondrial genome appears to be restricted to black-tailed deer distributed along the western portion of the Cascade and Sierra Nevada Ranges of the United States and Canada, whereas the ancestral white-tailed deer-like mitochondrial genome is restricted to the eastern United States and portions of Latin America and Caribbean regions. The “captured mitochondrial genome” has continued on an independent evolutionary trajectory and represents a unique and broadly distributed haplogroup that is 7.25% and 2.84% different from the ancestral mule deer and ancestral white-tailed deer haplogroups, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".