Logic-Based Benders Decomposition for Integrated Process Configuration and Production Planning Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a general logic-based Benders decomposition (LBBD) for production planning problems with process configuration decisions. This family of problems appears in contexts where the machines are set up according to specific patterns, templates, or, in general, process configurations that allow for simultaneously producing products of different types. The problem requires determining feasible configurations for the machines and their corresponding production levels to fulfill the demand at the minimum total cost. The structure of this problem contains nonlinear constraints that link the number of units produced of each product with the used configurations and their production levels. We decompose the original problem into a master problem, where the configurations are determined, and a subproblem, where the production amounts are determined. This allows us to apply the LBBD technique to solve the problem using a standard LBBD implementation and a branch-and-check algorithm. LBBD enhancements through logic-based inequalities generated for subsets of products with common characteristics are proposed. Such inequalities represent a form of the subproblem relaxation added to the master problem during its resolution. In our computational experiments, we apply the proposed LBBD approaches to two different applications from the literature: cutting stock problems in the steel industry and a printing problem. Results show that the LBBD methods find optimal solutions much faster than the solution approaches in the literature and have a superior performance with respect to the number of instances solved to optimality and the solution quality. Summary of Contribution: In this work, we introduce a unified exact solution algorithm based on logic-based Benders decomposition to solve a class of integrated production planning problems that include process configuration decisions. We propose a general mathematical representation of the original integrated planning problem and logic-based Benders reformulations that can be applied to solve several problems within the studied class. Our implementation frameworks provide guidelines to practitioners in the field. The solution approaches in this paper together with the proposed methodological enhancements can be adapted to solve other integrated planning problems in a similar context, including the case when the original problem has a complex combinatorial and nonlinear structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".