MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213134581 · doi:10.15562/ism.v12i2.1025

Alat ukur untuk menilai kemampuan fungsional pasien dengan osteoartritis lutut: tinjauan pustaka

2021· article· en· W4213134581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntisari Sains Medis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMedicinePhysical therapyHealth professionalsScale (ratio)Physical medicine and rehabilitationHealth careAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Osteoarthritis is a common disease that has become one of the main causes of disability and is ranked fourth as a contributing factor of disability. In Indonesia, many healthcare professionals, including physiotherapists, treat patients with various stages of osteoarthritis. Physiotherapists have a crucial role in improving the functional ability of patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, many of them do not use appropriate outcome measures to document patients’ improvements.Objective: This literature review aimed to summarize the available outcome measures that can be used to measure the functional ability of patients with knee osteoarthritis, in order to increase the awareness and knowledge of healthcare professionals, particularly physiotherapists, regarding the use of available outcome measures.Methods: The method used was literature review. Literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar databases using the main keywords: “outcome measure”, “scale”, “questionnaire”, “knee”, “osteoarthritis”, “functional ability”, “validity” and “reliability”.Result: This review identified 7 outcome measures in the form of questionnaires that can be used to measure the functional ability of patients with knee osteoarthritis. The most commonly used measure is the Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index, which has been translated and validated in various languages. All measuring instruments were established in developed countries, except for the Ibadan Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Measure. None of the 7 outcome measures have been translated and validated into Indonesian.Conclusion: This literature review has summarized measuring tools that can be used to measure the functional ability of patients with knee osteoarthritis. To date, no tools have been translated and validated into Indonesian. In the future, it is hoped that further research can be conducted in the form of cross-cultural adaptations studies on the validity and reliability of these outcome measures into Indonesian to support the effectiveness of using these measures to assess the functional ability of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Latar belakang: Osteoartritis merupakan penyakit umum yang menjadi salah satu penyebab utama kecacatandan menempati urutan keempat untuk faktor penyebab kecacatan. Di Indonesia, banyak tenaga kesehatan, termasuk fisioterapis, yang merawat pasien dengan bebagai stadium osteoartritis. Fisioterapis sangat berperan dalam meningkatkan aspek fungsional pasien dengan osteoartritis lutut. Namun, banyak yang masih belum menggunakan alat ukur yang sesuai untuk mendokumentasikan kemajuan pasien.Tujuan: Tujuan tinjauan pustaka ini adalah untuk merangkum alat ukur yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan fungsional pasien dengan osteoartritis lutut, guna meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kesadaran tenaga kesehatan, terutama fisioterapis, dalam penggunaan alat ukur yang tersedia.Metode: Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah tinjauan pustaka. Penelusuran artikel dilakukan pada database PubMed dan Google Scholar dengan kata kunci utama: “outcome measure”, “scale”, “questionnaire”, “knee”, “osteoarthritis”, “validity” dan “reliability”. Hasil: Tinjauan pustaka ini menemukan 7 alat ukur dalam bentuk kuisioner yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan fungsional pasien dengan osteoartritis lutut. Alat ukur yang paling sering digunakan adalah Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index, yang sudah diterjemahkan dan divalidasi ke dalam berbagai bahasa. Semua instrumen pengukuran dibuat oleh negara maju, kecuali Ibadan Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Measure. Dari 7 kuisioner, belum ada yang diterjemahkan dan divalidasi ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia.Kesimpulan: Tinjauan pustaka ini telah merangkum alat ukur yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan fungsional pasien dengan osteoartritis lutut. Sampai saat ini, belum ada kuisioner yang sudah diterjemahkan dan divalidasi ke dalam bahasa Indonesia. Diharapkan adanya pengembangan penelitian berupa studi adaptasi lintas budaya terhadap validitas dan realibilitas kuisioner lainnya ke dalam bahasa Indonesia untuk menunjang efektivitas penggunaan alat ukur dalam menilai kemampuan fungsional pasien dengan osteoartritis lutut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.417 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it