MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213140979 · doi:10.1517/eobt.3.6.1001.21267

Drug discovery for inflammatory diseases

2003· article· en· W4213140979 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inez Rogatsky

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Biological Therapy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunologyDrug discoveryInnate immune systemImmune systemChemokineAutoimmunityBioinformaticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drug Discovery for Inflammatory Diseases was a 3-day conference organised by the IBC Life Sciences as part of their Drug Discovery Series. The meeting featured a keynote presentation by Edward Keystone (University of Toronto) on the new strategies in managing rheumatoid arthritis, followed by five themed sessions: protein kinase inhibition, cytokines, chemokines, Toll-like receptors/innate immunity and transcription factors. The programme included a good mix of speakers from academia and biotechnology, and covered a wide spectrum of topics, ranging from developing strategies to suppress immune responses in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, to novel means of stimulating the immune system for vaccine development and cancer therapy. Fundamental basic science questions were addressed along with the new approaches to drug design and clinical studies. Overall, the meeting included over 25 presentations, and there was ample time to exchange ideas in an informal setting. This review will focus on five talks representing three different areas of research: the role of an unusual cytokine, leptin, in autoimmunity; targeting of Toll-like receptors in vaccine development and in cancer therapy; and the molecular dissection of glucocorticoid-mediated repression and of selective glucocorticoids with anti-inflammatory activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Biological TherapySame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207