A259 ASSESSING SYSTEM BASED QUALITY MEASURES IN THE CARE OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There has been a >75% increase in incidence since 1990 associated with annual Canadian healthcare costs greater than $200 million. Despite established guidelines for clinical management and quality indicators at the individual patient level, system-based performance measures are novel. Thus, hospital-based quality measures have recently been released by the American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) and are yet to be evaluated in a clinical setting. Aims To assess rates of compliance to the AGA quality and performance measures in the care of acute pancreatitis. Methods Retrospective chart review identified adult patients admitted with AP from June 2019 to May 2020 at Kingston Health Sciences Centre to review clinical profile. Data was collected, assessed, and stratified based on compliance with AGA performance measures of (1) cholecystectomy on index presentation of gallstone pancreatitis (GP), (2) initiation of early oral feeding within 24 hours, and (3) inappropriate parenteral nutrition (PN) use. Additional data collected included length of stay (LOS), presence of complications, and etiology of AP to assess for trends in associations. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was conducted. Results There were 130 admissions of AP during the study period, of which the most common aetiologies were GP (52.3%) and alcohol (16.9%). Unknown/idiopathic AP had an incidence rate of 22.3%. The most likely etiology of having a prior presentation of AP was unknown/idiopathic AP (34.5%), closely followed by alcoholic AP (32%). The incidence of complications was 13.1% and median LOS was 4 days. 63% of eligible GP patients underwent cholecystectomy on index admission, whereas 20% proceeded with cholecystectomy at a later date. 88% of admissions had a diet ordered within 24 hours of admission. The median LOS was 4 days in the early feeding group, in contrast to 7.5 days in admissions which did not have diet ordered within 24 hours. A total of 3 patients received parenteral nutrition, however only one of these patients was eligible for enteral feeding. Conclusions This study demonstrates that increasing cholecystectomy rates during index admission is an area to improve upon. Early diet orders were associated with a shorter hospital LOS; however additional evidence of direct correlation is required. Further studies are warranted to identify system level factors affecting quality of care as well as the development of targeted interventions in AP. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".